83 Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Taoiseach the amount paid in each calendar year since inception in respect of the e-Cabinet system, in tabular form; the initial outlay for the e-Cabinet system; the nature of the service provided; the person by whom it was provided; if there were tenders sought for each such contract and the successful company or person; when the e-Cabinet system will be reviewed; the approximate number of public sector staff who have access to the system; the number of Ministers who utilise the system; the anticipated future outlay for the e-Cabinet system, the number of Cabinet meetings at which the e-Cabinet system has been used by some or all Cabinet members; the number of meetings at which it has not; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22993/10]

Summary

83 Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Taoiseach the amount paid in each calendar year since inception in respect of the e-Cabinet system, in tabular form; the initial outlay for the e-Cabinet system; the nature of the service provided; the person by whom it was provided; if there were tenders sought for each such contract and the successful company or person; when the e-Cabinet system will be reviewed; the approximate number of public sector staff who have access to the system; the number of Ministers who utilise the system; the anticipated future outlay for the e-Cabinet system, the number of Cabinet meetings at which the e-Cabinet system has been used by some or all Cabinet members; the number of meetings at which it has not; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22993/10]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Departmental Expenditure

  xml · EN · 1 June 2010

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.