PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 663

663. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if her Department has been involved in any court proceedings that involved non-disclosure agreements in the past five years; and if so, the specific court ruling that prevented knowledge of the court proceeding being made known and knowledge of the participants to the court proceeding from being made known for each of these agreements. [39862/16]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

13 December 2016

Last action

13 December 2016 · Departmental Legal Cases

Status

written

Sponsors

Tóibín, Peadar.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

13 December 2016

Summary

663. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if her Department has been involved in any court proceedings that involved non-disclosure agreements in the past five years; and if so, the specific court ruling that prevented knowledge of the court proceeding being made known and knowledge of the participants to the court proceeding from being made known for each of these agreements. [39862/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 13 December 2016

    Departmental Legal Cases

    663. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs if her Department has been involved in any court proceedings that involved non-disclosure agreements in the past five years; and if so, the specific court ruling that prevented knowledge of the court proceeding being made known and knowledge of the participants to the court proceeding from being made known for each of these agreements. [39862/16]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Legal Cases

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.