PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 668

668. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection her views on whether her Department should not only acknowledge but offer an apology to a person (details supplied) after the Data Commissioner has found that her Department failed in its duty of care to protect information and personal data that it held on the person; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [50519/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

28 November 2017

Last action

28 November 2017 · Data Protection

Status

written

Sponsors

Boyd Barrett, Richard.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 November 2017

Summary

668. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection her views on whether her Department should not only acknowledge but offer an apology to a person (details supplied) after the Data Commissioner has found that her Department failed in its duty of care to protect information and personal data that it held on the person; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [50519/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 28 November 2017

    Data Protection

    668. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection her views on whether her Department should not only acknowledge but offer an apology to a person (details supplied) after the Data Commissioner has found that her Department failed in its duty of care to protect information and personal data that it held on the person; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [50519/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Data Protection

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.