Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 678

678. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Health the reason for a price discrepancy of 176% between the purchase of a drug (details supplied) privately compared to its purchase through the drugs payment scheme; if this is the case for all drugs; his plans to tackle this variance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11828/15]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

24 March 2015

Last action

24 March 2015 · Medicinal Products Prices

Status

written

Sponsors

Billy Kelleher

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

24 March 2015

Summary

678. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Health the reason for a price discrepancy of 176% between the purchase of a drug (details supplied) privately compared to its purchase through the drugs payment scheme; if this is the case for all drugs; his plans to tackle this variance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11828/15]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 24 March 2015

    Medicinal Products Prices

    678. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Health the reason for a price discrepancy of 176% between the purchase of a drug (details supplied) privately compared to its purchase through the drugs payment scheme; if this is the case for all drugs; his plans to tackle this variance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11828/15]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Medicinal Products Prices

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.