PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 68

68. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Social Protection his plans to review the eligibility system for the State pension, in view of the fact that a recent report (details supplied) reveals that as a result of the changes to eligibility that 35,000 persons had their pensions reduced; his further plans to address the pension gap between genders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8448/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

21 February 2017

Last action

21 February 2017 · State Pension (Contributory)

Status

written

Sponsors

Murphy, Catherine.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

21 February 2017

Summary

68. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Social Protection his plans to review the eligibility system for the State pension, in view of the fact that a recent report (details supplied) reveals that as a result of the changes to eligibility that 35,000 persons had their pensions reduced; his further plans to address the pension gap between genders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8448/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 21 February 2017

    State Pension (Contributory)

    68. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Social Protection his plans to review the eligibility system for the State pension, in view of the fact that a recent report (details supplied) reveals that as a result of the changes to eligibility that 35,000 persons had their pensions reduced; his further plans to address the pension gap between genders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8448/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

State Pension (Contributory)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.