PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 68

68. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if under the general block exemption regulation, GBER, it is possible to loosen the connected person restrictions for the scheme; the estimated full-year cost of implementing a 30% limit by which a person is only deemed connected if they or an associate owns more than 30% of the company; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34927/19]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

6 September 2019

Last action

6 September 2019 · Employment and Investment Incentive Scheme

Status

written

Sponsors

McGrath, Michael.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

6 September 2019

Summary

68. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if under the general block exemption regulation, GBER, it is possible to loosen the connected person restrictions for the scheme; the estimated full-year cost of implementing a 30% limit by which a person is only deemed connected if they or an associate owns more than 30% of the company; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34927/19]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 6 September 2019

    Employment and Investment Incentive Scheme

    68. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if under the general block exemption regulation, GBER, it is possible to loosen the connected person restrictions for the scheme; the estimated full-year cost of implementing a 30% limit by which a person is only deemed connected if they or an associate owns more than 30% of the company; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34927/19]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Employment and Investment Incentive Scheme

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.