PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 694

694. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government if he will confirm that phase two of the Rush sewerage treatment pipeline project, County Dublin, has been spilt into two contracts; the justification for this decision; and its impact in terms of the timescale for delivery of the overall necessary upgrade to the system in the area. [1826/13]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

16 January 2013

Last action

16 January 2013 · Water and Sewerage Schemes Status

Status

written

Sponsors

Daly, Clare.

Subjects

Environment

Source updated

16 January 2013

Environment

Summary

694. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government if he will confirm that phase two of the Rush sewerage treatment pipeline project, County Dublin, has been spilt into two contracts; the justification for this decision; and its impact in terms of the timescale for delivery of the overall necessary upgrade to the system in the area. [1826/13]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 16 January 2013

    Water and Sewerage Schemes Status

    694. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government if he will confirm that phase two of the Rush sewerage treatment pipeline project, County Dublin, has been spilt into two contracts; the justification for this decision; and its impact in terms of the timescale for delivery of the overall necessary upgrade to the system in the area. [1826/13]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Water and Sewerage Schemes Status

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Daly, Clare. · Asking member
  • Environment · Environment · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.