PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 697

697. Deputy Derek Nolan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the measures that have been taken to open competition for contracts for direct provision per the recommendations of the Value for Money Report 2010; the reason the awarding of these contracts is not governed by European Communities (Award of Public Authorities’ Contracts) Regulations 2006 (SI 329/2006); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26866/13]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

11 June 2013

Last action

11 June 2013 · Direct Provision System

Status

written

Sponsors

Nolan, Derek.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

11 June 2013

Summary

697. Deputy Derek Nolan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the measures that have been taken to open competition for contracts for direct provision per the recommendations of the Value for Money Report 2010; the reason the awarding of these contracts is not governed by European Communities (Award of Public Authorities’ Contracts) Regulations 2006 (SI 329/2006); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26866/13]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 11 June 2013

    Direct Provision System

    697. Deputy Derek Nolan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the measures that have been taken to open competition for contracts for direct provision per the recommendations of the Value for Money Report 2010; the reason the awarding of these contracts is not governed by European Communities (Award of Public Authorities’ Contracts) Regulations 2006 (SI 329/2006); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26866/13]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Direct Provision System

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.