PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 70

70. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the number of cases in which his Department has subsequently refused or reduced pension entitlement in which a serving soldier has been injured on duty and whose award arising therefrom ultimately affects the person's pension entitlements, such as in the case of a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42737/18]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

17 October 2018

Last action

17 October 2018 · Defence Forces Pensions

Status

written

Sponsors

Durkan, Bernard J.

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

17 October 2018

Defence

Summary

70. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the number of cases in which his Department has subsequently refused or reduced pension entitlement in which a serving soldier has been injured on duty and whose award arising therefrom ultimately affects the person's pension entitlements, such as in the case of a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42737/18]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 17 October 2018

    Defence Forces Pensions

    70. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence the number of cases in which his Department has subsequently refused or reduced pension entitlement in which a serving soldier has been injured on duty and whose award arising therefrom ultimately affects the person's pension entitlements, such as in the case of a person (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42737/18]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Defence Forces Pensions

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.