PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 71

61 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Defence his Department’s lands disposed of by the Government in each of the past ten years, the value of each disposal; the purpose for which the proceeds were used; if further lands have been identified for disposal; his views on investing the proceeds of Defence Force lands in the Defence Forces; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38188/06]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

16 November 2006

Last action

16 November 2006 · Defence Forces Property.

Status

written

Sponsors

Emmet Stagg

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

16 November 2006

Defence

Summary

61 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Defence his Department’s lands disposed of by the Government in each of the past ten years, the value of each disposal; the purpose for which the proceeds were used; if further lands have been identified for disposal; his views on investing the proceeds of Defence Force lands in the Defence Forces; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38188/06]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 16 November 2006

    Defence Forces Property.

    61 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Defence his Department’s lands disposed of by the Government in each of the past ten years, the value of each disposal; the purpose for which the proceeds were used; if further lands have been identified for disposal; his views on investing the proceeds of Defence Force lands in the Defence Forces; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38188/06]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Defence Forces Property.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Emmet Stagg · Asking member
  • Minister for Defence · Minister for Defence · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.