PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 71

71 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection if she has studied the decision of the appeals officer in his decision to withdraw jobseeker’s allowance in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare, with particular reference to the evidence adduced at the oral hearing, whereby the actual evidence submitted by the applicant completely refuted the assertions of the investigating officer; if she will now facilitate a full review of the case by a different officer, in view of the fact that an appeals officer decision is final in the absence of new evidence; if her attention has been drawn to the fact that the value of the review assessed in this case was at least seven times the actual value, and that this was conveyed to the appeals officer; if she has satisfied herself that the principles of due process and natural justice have been served; if her attention has been drawn to the consequent hardship caused to the family in this instance; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [8105/11]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

14 April 2011

Last action

14 April 2011 · Social Welfare Appeals

Status

written

Sponsors

Durkan, Bernard J.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 April 2011

Summary

71 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection if she has studied the decision of the appeals officer in his decision to withdraw jobseeker’s allowance in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare, with particular reference to the evidence adduced at the oral hearing, whereby the actual evidence submitted by the applicant completely refuted the assertions of the investigating officer; if she will now facilitate a full review of the case by a different officer, in view of the fact that an appeals officer decision is final in the absence of new evidence; if her attention has been drawn to the fact that the value of the review assessed in this case was at least seven times the actual value, and that this was conveyed to the appeals officer; if she has satisfied herself that the principles of due process and natural justice have been served; if her attention has been drawn to the consequent hardship caused to the family in this instance; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [8105/11]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 14 April 2011

    Social Welfare Appeals

    71 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Social Protection if she has studied the decision of the appeals officer in his decision to withdraw jobseeker’s allowance in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare, with particular reference to the evidence adduced at the oral hearing, whereby the actual evidence submitted by the applicant completely refuted the assertions of the investigating officer; if she will now facilitate a full review of the case by a different officer, in view of the fact that an appeals officer decision is final in the absence of new evidence; if her attention has been drawn to the fact that the value of the review assessed in this case was at least seven times the actual value, and that this was conveyed to the appeals officer; if she has satisfied herself that the principles of due process and natural justice have been served; if her attention has been drawn to the consequent hardship caused to the family in this instance; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [8105/11]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Social Welfare Appeals

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Durkan, Bernard J. · Asking member
  • Minister for Social Protection · Minister for Social Protection · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.