Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 745

745. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration further to Parliamentary Question No 210 of 20 January 2026, the position regarding the use of a historical investigation unit for the investigation of troubled-related cases; the reason the relevant Garda division was determined to be ‘the most appropriate and effective approach in this jurisdiction’; and his views on the way in which the Government is ensuring full compliance with the procedural obligation for investigations into loss of life and acts of torture and ill-treatment under Articles 2 and 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [8678/26]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

4 February 2026

Last action

—

Status

written

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

4 February 2026

Summary

745. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration further to Parliamentary Question No 210 of 20 January 2026, the position regarding the use of a historical investigation unit for the investigation of troubled-related cases; the reason the relevant Garda division was determined to be ‘the most appropriate and effective approach in this jurisdiction’; and his views on the way in which the Government is ensuring full compliance with the procedural obligation for investigations into loss of life and acts of torture and ill-treatment under Articles 2 and 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [8678/26]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Northern Ireland

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.