Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 748

748. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade further to Parliamentary Question No. 448 of 10 March 2015, in view of the fact that the United States of America air force itself describes the EC-130H as an airborne tactical weapon system using a heavily modified version of the C-130 Hercules airframe and that its primary function is electronic warfare, suppression of enemy air defenses and offensive counter information, the reason he can accept assurances that it was unarmed and did not form part of military exercises or operations when it landed in Shannon on 28 February 2015, without prior permission. [11994/15]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

24 March 2015

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

24 March 2015

Summary

748. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade further to Parliamentary Question No. 448 of 10 March 2015, in view of the fact that the United States of America air force itself describes the EC-130H as an airborne tactical weapon system using a heavily modified version of the C-130 Hercules airframe and that its primary function is electronic warfare, suppression of enemy air defenses and offensive counter information, the reason he can accept assurances that it was unarmed and did not form part of military exercises or operations when it landed in Shannon on 28 February 2015, without prior permission. [11994/15]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Military Aircraft Landings

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.