PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 757

802 Deputy Ruairí Quinn asked the Minister for Defence the amount of mobile telephone bills paid in the form of expenses to staff by his Department in 2006 and to date in 2007; the percentage or amount of this for each year that applies to data charges; the percentage or amount of this for each year that applies to roaming charges; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [33350/07]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

11 December 2007

Last action

11 December 2007 · Departmental Expenditure.

Status

written

Sponsors

Ruairí Quinn

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

11 December 2007

Defence

Summary

802 Deputy Ruairí Quinn asked the Minister for Defence the amount of mobile telephone bills paid in the form of expenses to staff by his Department in 2006 and to date in 2007; the percentage or amount of this for each year that applies to data charges; the percentage or amount of this for each year that applies to roaming charges; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [33350/07]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 11 December 2007

    Departmental Expenditure.

    802 Deputy Ruairí Quinn asked the Minister for Defence the amount of mobile telephone bills paid in the form of expenses to staff by his Department in 2006 and to date in 2007; the percentage or amount of this for each year that applies to data charges; the percentage or amount of this for each year that applies to roaming charges; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [33350/07]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Expenditure.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Ruairí Quinn · Asking member
  • Minister for Defence · Minister for Defence · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.