PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 778

778. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if she is aware that the terms and conditions of employment of staff at Waterford Airport have been negatively altered, that a ballot for industrial action is under way and that the airport receives significant State funding; the action she will take to protect the rights of these workers; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21036/16]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

12 July 2016

Last action

12 July 2016 · Industrial Disputes

Status

written

Sponsors

Cullinane, David.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

12 July 2016

Summary

778. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if she is aware that the terms and conditions of employment of staff at Waterford Airport have been negatively altered, that a ballot for industrial action is under way and that the airport receives significant State funding; the action she will take to protect the rights of these workers; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21036/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 July 2016

    Industrial Disputes

    778. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation if she is aware that the terms and conditions of employment of staff at Waterford Airport have been negatively altered, that a ballot for industrial action is under way and that the airport receives significant State funding; the action she will take to protect the rights of these workers; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [21036/16]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Industrial Disputes

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.