PQ 79
79. Deputy Jackie Cahill asked the Minister for Education and Skills if he will review the fact that teachers who work in ASTI schools but chose not to join a union have not received pay increments, with collective bargaining being cited as the reason, in view of the fact it is not the role of the employer to couple pay parity with union membership; if it is constitutional to treat non-union teaching staff in this way; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10494/17]
Introduced
1 March 2017
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
1 March 2017
Summary
79. Deputy Jackie Cahill asked the Minister for Education and Skills if he will review the fact that teachers who work in ASTI schools but chose not to join a union have not received pay increments, with collective bargaining being cited as the reason, in view of the fact it is not the role of the employer to couple pay parity with union membership; if it is constitutional to treat non-union teaching staff in this way; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10494/17]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Lansdowne Road Agreement
Lansdowne Road Agreement
xml · EN · 1 March 2017
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2017-03-01/79/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2017-03-01/pq_79