PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 8

63 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Defence if he will outline when the two week camp for the second line reserve was terminated; the reasons advanced for the termination at the time; whether any evaluation has been undertaken by the directors of reserve forces or training into the consequences of such cutback since then; if so if he will outline their recommendations to improve matters; whether he has considered bringing back the two week camp; the additional cost of a further weeks camp divided between (1) rations, (2) pay and (3) other costs; the cost of the current one week camp; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

31 October 1991

Last action

Status

oral

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

31 October 1991

Summary

63 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Defence if he will outline when the two week camp for the second line reserve was terminated; the reasons advanced for the termination at the time; whether any evaluation has been undertaken by the directors of reserve forces or training into the consequences of such cutback since then; if so if he will outline their recommendations to improve matters; whether he has considered bringing back the two week camp; the additional cost of a further weeks camp divided between (1) rations, (2) pay and (3) other costs; the cost of the current one week camp; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Defence Forces Training.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.