PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 8

4 Mr. Cowen asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry whether approximately 40 per cent of the application collated by the appeals panel was not considered by the EU as part of the application for the extension of disadvantaged areas; if so, the reason therefor; if an omission of this magnitude was ever made on previous applications; the opportunities, if any, farmers from those excluded areas now have to have their cases re-opened; if he will make available the data submitted in respect of those townlands that have been excluded to farmers in those areas on request; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13920/96]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

27 June 1996

Last action

Status

oral

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

27 June 1996

Summary

4 Mr. Cowen asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry whether approximately 40 per cent of the application collated by the appeals panel was not considered by the EU as part of the application for the extension of disadvantaged areas; if so, the reason therefor; if an omission of this magnitude was ever made on previous applications; the opportunities, if any, farmers from those excluded areas now have to have their cases re-opened; if he will make available the data submitted in respect of those townlands that have been excluded to farmers in those areas on request; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13920/96]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Disadvantaged Areas Classification.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.