PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 8

8. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance the measures he is taking or considering taking to prevent possible abuses of the tax relief such as artificial inflation of costs or failure to adhere to the requirement in the legislation for the provision of quality employment and training in relation to section 481 tax relief in the film industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48532/18]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

22 November 2018

Last action

22 November 2018 · Film Industry Tax Reliefs

Status

oral

Sponsors

Boyd Barrett, Richard.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

22 November 2018

Summary

8. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance the measures he is taking or considering taking to prevent possible abuses of the tax relief such as artificial inflation of costs or failure to adhere to the requirement in the legislation for the provision of quality employment and training in relation to section 481 tax relief in the film industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48532/18]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 22 November 2018

    Film Industry Tax Reliefs

    8. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance the measures he is taking or considering taking to prevent possible abuses of the tax relief such as artificial inflation of costs or failure to adhere to the requirement in the legislation for the provision of quality employment and training in relation to section 481 tax relief in the film industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48532/18]

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Film Industry Tax Reliefs

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.