Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 83

83. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the number of persons that requested a P21 balancing statement from the Revenue Commissioners; the refunds issued to persons and additional tax collected from persons as a result in each of the years 2010 to 2016 in aggregate form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26498/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

1 June 2017

Last action

1 June 2017 · Revenue Commissioners Data

Status

written

Sponsors

Michael McGrath

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 June 2017

Summary

83. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the number of persons that requested a P21 balancing statement from the Revenue Commissioners; the refunds issued to persons and additional tax collected from persons as a result in each of the years 2010 to 2016 in aggregate form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26498/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 1 June 2017

    Revenue Commissioners Data

    83. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the number of persons that requested a P21 balancing statement from the Revenue Commissioners; the refunds issued to persons and additional tax collected from persons as a result in each of the years 2010 to 2016 in aggregate form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26498/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Revenue Commissioners Data

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.