PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 83

83. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the number of entities availing of the EIIS; the number of which are private investors, SMEs and microenterprises; the average annual relief for each private investor, SME and microenterprise; the annual cost of the scheme; the number of persons employed as a direct result of the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53742/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

14 December 2017

Last action

14 December 2017 · Employment Investment Incentive Scheme Data

Status

written

Sponsors

McGrath, Michael.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 December 2017

Summary

83. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the number of entities availing of the EIIS; the number of which are private investors, SMEs and microenterprises; the average annual relief for each private investor, SME and microenterprise; the annual cost of the scheme; the number of persons employed as a direct result of the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53742/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 14 December 2017

    Employment Investment Incentive Scheme Data

    83. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the number of entities availing of the EIIS; the number of which are private investors, SMEs and microenterprises; the average annual relief for each private investor, SME and microenterprise; the annual cost of the scheme; the number of persons employed as a direct result of the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53742/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Employment Investment Incentive Scheme Data

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.