Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 839

839. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Justice given that the Government has adopted an organisation’s working definition of antisemitism (details supplied), whether the illustrative examples of antisemitism appended to this definition should be considered to have also been adopted by the Government; if this is not the case, how he will ensure that this is clear to all relevant staff, officials and those in receipt of relevant education or training; and to respond to concerns that several examples are disputable and to concerns that several examples are ambiguous; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24471/25]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

13 May 2025

Last action

—

Status

written

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

13 May 2025

Summary

839. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Justice given that the Government has adopted an organisation’s working definition of antisemitism (details supplied), whether the illustrative examples of antisemitism appended to this definition should be considered to have also been adopted by the Government; if this is not the case, how he will ensure that this is clear to all relevant staff, officials and those in receipt of relevant education or training; and to respond to concerns that several examples are disputable and to concerns that several examples are ambiguous; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24471/25]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Policies

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.