PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 85

85. Deputy Gary Gannon asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science his views on the progress of the national review into PhD conditions; if he will provide a full work plan for the review as laid out by the chairs; the meetings the chairs have had or plan to have with stakeholders; and the anticipated date of completion for the review. [6932/23]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

14 February 2023

Last action

14 February 2023 · Departmental Reviews

Status

written

Sponsors

Gannon, Gary.

Subjects

Education

Source updated

14 February 2023

Education

Summary

85. Deputy Gary Gannon asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science his views on the progress of the national review into PhD conditions; if he will provide a full work plan for the review as laid out by the chairs; the meetings the chairs have had or plan to have with stakeholders; and the anticipated date of completion for the review. [6932/23]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 14 February 2023

    Departmental Reviews

    85. Deputy Gary Gannon asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science his views on the progress of the national review into PhD conditions; if he will provide a full work plan for the review as laid out by the chairs; the meetings the chairs have had or plan to have with stakeholders; and the anticipated date of completion for the review. [6932/23]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Reviews

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Gannon, Gary. · Asking member
  • Further and Higher Education · Further and Higher Education · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.