PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 862

862. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 479 of 12 March 2013 and Supreme Court Justice Hardiman's statement in a case (details supplied), if he sees that State litigation conducted in this way is at the public's expense; the cost benefit analysis procedures in place to determine the efficacy of his Department's litigation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16757/13]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

16 April 2013

Last action

16 April 2013 · Departmental Legal Cases

Status

written

Sponsors

O'Sullivan, Maureen.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

16 April 2013

Summary

862. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 479 of 12 March 2013 and Supreme Court Justice Hardiman's statement in a case (details supplied), if he sees that State litigation conducted in this way is at the public's expense; the cost benefit analysis procedures in place to determine the efficacy of his Department's litigation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16757/13]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 16 April 2013

    Departmental Legal Cases

    862. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 479 of 12 March 2013 and Supreme Court Justice Hardiman's statement in a case (details supplied), if he sees that State litigation conducted in this way is at the public's expense; the cost benefit analysis procedures in place to determine the efficacy of his Department's litigation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16757/13]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Legal Cases

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.