87. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No.162 of 21 November 2013, the reasons that exist under the Data Protection Acts for the non-return of seized data equipment by the Revenue sheriff to persons; the way the Revenue sheriff makes the information held about persons on such equipment secure; if his attention has been drawn to any breach of the Data Protection Acts by the Revenue sheriff in any regard but particularly with regard to the sale of seized equipment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52654/13]

Summary

87. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No.162 of 21 November 2013, the reasons that exist under the Data Protection Acts for the non-return of seized data equipment by the Revenue sheriff to persons; the way the Revenue sheriff makes the information held about persons on such equipment secure; if his attention has been drawn to any breach of the Data Protection Acts by the Revenue sheriff in any regard but particularly with regard to the sale of seized equipment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52654/13]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Data Protection

  xml · EN · 10 December 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.