Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 87

87. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection her plans to reassess the maximum participation time limit with regard to community employment schemes for persons aged 55 and over, which currently stands at six years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39868/14]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

21 October 2014

Last action

21 October 2014 · Community Employment Schemes Eligibility

Status

written

Sponsors

Mick Wallace

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

21 October 2014

Summary

87. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection her plans to reassess the maximum participation time limit with regard to community employment schemes for persons aged 55 and over, which currently stands at six years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39868/14]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 21 October 2014

    Community Employment Schemes Eligibility

    87. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection her plans to reassess the maximum participation time limit with regard to community employment schemes for persons aged 55 and over, which currently stands at six years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [39868/14]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Community Employment Schemes Eligibility

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • Mick Wallace · Asking member
  • Social · Social · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.