PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 875

875. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Transport; Tourism and Sport further to this Deputy's previous Parliamentary Question and his reply regarding the Chief Executive Officer of Dún Laoghaire Harbour Company receiving €19,877 in lieu of annual leave, if he accepts that under the Organisation of Working Time Act it is illegal for someone to sell an entitlement to annual leave; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23220/15]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

16 June 2015

Last action

16 June 2015 · State Bodies

Status

written

Sponsors

Richard Boyd Barrett

Subjects

Transport

Source updated

16 June 2015

Transport

Summary

875. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Transport; Tourism and Sport further to this Deputy's previous Parliamentary Question and his reply regarding the Chief Executive Officer of Dún Laoghaire Harbour Company receiving €19,877 in lieu of annual leave, if he accepts that under the Organisation of Working Time Act it is illegal for someone to sell an entitlement to annual leave; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23220/15]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 16 June 2015

    State Bodies

    875. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Transport; Tourism and Sport further to this Deputy's previous Parliamentary Question and his reply regarding the Chief Executive Officer of Dún Laoghaire Harbour Company receiving €19,877 in lieu of annual leave, if he accepts that under the Organisation of Working Time Act it is illegal for someone to sell an entitlement to annual leave; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23220/15]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.