PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 889

889. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 548 and 549 of 28 June 2016, if she is satisfied that the reply provided by the court does not violate Article 3 of Regulation No. 1182/71 of the EU Council (1971) which determines the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits, by which EU member states are legally bound (details supplied); if she will instruct the Labour Court to account for its current practice which seems to run counter to this regulation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22606/16]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

19 July 2016

Last action

19 July 2016 · Labour Court

Status

written

Sponsors

Shortall, Róisín.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 July 2016

Summary

889. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 548 and 549 of 28 June 2016, if she is satisfied that the reply provided by the court does not violate Article 3 of Regulation No. 1182/71 of the EU Council (1971) which determines the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits, by which EU member states are legally bound (details supplied); if she will instruct the Labour Court to account for its current practice which seems to run counter to this regulation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22606/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 July 2016

    Labour Court

    889. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 548 and 549 of 28 June 2016, if she is satisfied that the reply provided by the court does not violate Article 3 of Regulation No. 1182/71 of the EU Council (1971) which determines the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits, by which EU member states are legally bound (details supplied); if she will instruct the Labour Court to account for its current practice which seems to run counter to this regulation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22606/16]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.