891. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he will explain the contradiction between his statement to Dáil Éireann on 12 July 2016 that non-unionised public service workers who comply with the terms of that collective agreement will attract the benefits of the Lansdowne Road Agreement on one hand and the statement from the Department of Education and Skills on the other, as reported recently (details supplied); if his statement of 12 July 2016 is still valid in the context of the publicly-stated position of the Department of Education and Skills; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24882/16]

Summary

891. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if he will explain the contradiction between his statement to Dáil Éireann on 12 July 2016 that non-unionised public service workers who comply with the terms of that collective agreement will attract the benefits of the Lansdowne Road Agreement on one hand and the statement from the Department of Education and Skills on the other, as reported recently (details supplied); if his statement of 12 July 2016 is still valid in the context of the publicly-stated position of the Department of Education and Skills; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [24882/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Lansdowne Road Agreement

  xml · EN · 16 September 2016

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.