5 Mr. Nealon asked the Minister for Defence if, in accordance with the recommendations of the Gleeson Commission, it is his intention to order that a review be undertaken by professional management consultants of (1) the management structures within the Defence Forces (2) the relationship between military and civil management (3) the geographical deployment of the Defence Forces (4) physical asset management and the systems of arm procurement and (5) financial management and information management, which should operate in the Defence Forces and his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Summary

5 Mr. Nealon asked the Minister for Defence if, in accordance with the recommendations of the Gleeson Commission, it is his intention to order that a review be undertaken by professional management consultants of (1) the management structures within the Defence Forces (2) the relationship between military and civil management (3) the geographical deployment of the Defence Forces (4) physical asset management and the systems of arm procurement and (5) financial management and information management, which should operate in the Defence Forces and his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Defence Forces Review.

  xml · EN · 25 October 1990

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.