PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 9

172 Miss M. Wallace asked the Minister for Social Welfare if his attention has been drawn to an anomaly within his Department's regulations which require immediate modification where a self-employed person who commenced paying PRSI in 1988 but was over the age of 56 should be entitled to a refund of 53 per cent of his contributions, but that these refunds are being withheld in his Department in view of an anomaly where the same applicant paid social insurance stamped contributions for two years in the 1950's and in view of paying these extra two years he is not entitled to a refund on the same basis as other self-employed contributors who came into the scheme in 1988 and who are over the age of qualifying for a pension; his views on whether self-employed persons who came into the scheme in 1988 should be either entitled to payment of a pension or a refund and it is unacceptable for his Department to refrain from either paying a pension or a refund of the contributions; and the steps, if any, he proposes to take to ensure that a review takes place of the regulations in order to modify these anomalies. [3551/95]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

14 February 1995

Last action

Status

oral

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 February 1995

Summary

172 Miss M. Wallace asked the Minister for Social Welfare if his attention has been drawn to an anomaly within his Department's regulations which require immediate modification where a self-employed person who commenced paying PRSI in 1988 but was over the age of 56 should be entitled to a refund of 53 per cent of his contributions, but that these refunds are being withheld in his Department in view of an anomaly where the same applicant paid social insurance stamped contributions for two years in the 1950's and in view of paying these extra two years he is not entitled to a refund on the same basis as other self-employed contributors who came into the scheme in 1988 and who are over the age of qualifying for a pension; his views on whether self-employed persons who came into the scheme in 1988 should be either entitled to payment of a pension or a refund and it is unacceptable for his Department to refrain from either paying a pension or a refund of the contributions; and the steps, if any, he proposes to take to ensure that a review takes place of the regulations in order to modify these anomalies. [3551/95]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Old Age Contributory Pension Scheme.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.