PQ 9
172 Miss M. Wallace asked the Minister for Social Welfare if his attention has been drawn to an anomaly within his Department's regulations which require immediate modification where a self-employed person who commenced paying PRSI in 1988 but was over the age of 56 should be entitled to a refund of 53 per cent of his contributions, but that these refunds are being withheld in his Department in view of an anomaly where the same applicant paid social insurance stamped contributions for two years in the 1950's and in view of paying these extra two years he is not entitled to a refund on the same basis as other self-employed contributors who came into the scheme in 1988 and who are over the age of qualifying for a pension; his views on whether self-employed persons who came into the scheme in 1988 should be either entitled to payment of a pension or a refund and it is unacceptable for his Department to refrain from either paying a pension or a refund of the contributions; and the steps, if any, he proposes to take to ensure that a review takes place of the regulations in order to modify these anomalies. [3551/95]
Introduced
14 February 1995
Last action
—
Status
oral
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
14 February 1995
Summary
172 Miss M. Wallace asked the Minister for Social Welfare if his attention has been drawn to an anomaly within his Department's regulations which require immediate modification where a self-employed person who commenced paying PRSI in 1988 but was over the age of 56 should be entitled to a refund of 53 per cent of his contributions, but that these refunds are being withheld in his Department in view of an anomaly where the same applicant paid social insurance stamped contributions for two years in the 1950's and in view of paying these extra two years he is not entitled to a refund on the same basis as other self-employed contributors who came into the scheme in 1988 and who are over the age of qualifying for a pension; his views on whether self-employed persons who came into the scheme in 1988 should be either entitled to payment of a pension or a refund and it is unacceptable for his Department to refrain from either paying a pension or a refund of the contributions; and the steps, if any, he proposes to take to ensure that a review takes place of the regulations in order to modify these anomalies. [3551/95]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Old Age Contributory Pension Scheme.
Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Old Age Contributory Pension Scheme.
xml · EN · 14 February 1995
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/1995-02-14/9/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/1995-02-14/pq_9