PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 9

41 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Defence if he will reconcile his assertion, articulated in responses by him to parliamentary questions, that Irish commitments to EU battle groups will not necessitate extra defence spending with the demand made on radio on 4 October 2006 by Defence Forces representative association PDFORRA for more funding and manpower in order to meet their new commitment to EU battle groups. [32259/06]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

12 October 2006

Last action

12 October 2006 · Overseas Missions.

Status

oral

Sponsors

Ó Snodaigh, Aengus.

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

12 October 2006

Defence

Summary

41 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Defence if he will reconcile his assertion, articulated in responses by him to parliamentary questions, that Irish commitments to EU battle groups will not necessitate extra defence spending with the demand made on radio on 4 October 2006 by Defence Forces representative association PDFORRA for more funding and manpower in order to meet their new commitment to EU battle groups. [32259/06]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 October 2006

    Overseas Missions.

    41 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Defence if he will reconcile his assertion, articulated in responses by him to parliamentary questions, that Irish commitments to EU battle groups will not necessitate extra defence spending with the demand made on radio on 4 October 2006 by Defence Forces representative association PDFORRA for more funding and manpower in order to meet their new commitment to EU battle groups. [32259/06]

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Overseas Missions.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.