PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 91

91 Mr. Ryan asked the Minister for Defence if, in the context of the Efficiency Audit Group report into the running of his Department and the foreign military administrations studied in the preparation of the final report he will outline whether it included New Zealand and Switzerland; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

20 February 1992

Last action

20 February 1992 · Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Defence Forces Efficiency Audit Group Report.

Status

oral

Sponsors

Ryan, Seán.

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

20 February 1992

Defence

Summary

91 Mr. Ryan asked the Minister for Defence if, in the context of the Efficiency Audit Group report into the running of his Department and the foreign military administrations studied in the preparation of the final report he will outline whether it included New Zealand and Switzerland; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 20 February 1992

    Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Defence Forces Efficiency Audit Group Report.

    91 Mr. Ryan asked the Minister for Defence if, in the context of the Efficiency Audit Group report into the running of his Department and the foreign military administrations studied in the preparation of the final report he will outline whether it included New Zealand and Switzerland; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Defence Forces Efficiency Audit Group Report.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Ryan, Seán. · Asking member
  • Minister for Defence · Minister for Defence · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.