93 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food his views on whether it would be advantageous in the interests of the public health, and particularly the health and safety of children, to use the powers vested in him under section 5(1) of the Noxious Weeds Act, 1936, to describe the giant hogweed as a noxious weed as defined in that Act; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17650/98]

Summary

93 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food his views on whether it would be advantageous in the interests of the public health, and particularly the health and safety of children, to use the powers vested in him under section 5(1) of the Noxious Weeds Act, 1936, to describe the giant hogweed as a noxious weed as defined in that Act; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17650/98]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

1. 6 October 1998

   Ceisteanna — Questions (Resumed) - Noxious Weeds Legislation.

   93 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food his views on whether it would be advantageous in the interests of the public health, and particularly the health and safety of children, to use the powers vested in him under section 5(1) of the Noxious Weeds Act, 1936, to describe the giant hogweed as a noxious weed as defined in that Act; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17650/98]

   Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Ceisteanna — Questions (Resumed) - Noxious Weeds Legislation.

  xml · EN · 6 October 1998

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• Gormley, John. · Asking member
• Minister for Agriculture and Food · Minister for Agriculture and Food · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.