PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 96

96. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance the ongoing efforts being made by his Department and the Revenue Commissioners to ensure full compliance by film production companies with the conditions attached to receipt of section 481 film tax relief particularly following a recent ruling by the scope section that one of the regular recipients of section 481 over many years was found to have wrongly classified an employee as self-employed and in circumstances in which many workers in the industry claim this practice is widespread; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17197/21]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

31 March 2021

Last action

31 March 2021 · Tax Reliefs

Status

written

Sponsors

Boyd Barrett, Richard.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

31 March 2021

Summary

96. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance the ongoing efforts being made by his Department and the Revenue Commissioners to ensure full compliance by film production companies with the conditions attached to receipt of section 481 film tax relief particularly following a recent ruling by the scope section that one of the regular recipients of section 481 over many years was found to have wrongly classified an employee as self-employed and in circumstances in which many workers in the industry claim this practice is widespread; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17197/21]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 31 March 2021

    Tax Reliefs

    96. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Finance the ongoing efforts being made by his Department and the Revenue Commissioners to ensure full compliance by film production companies with the conditions attached to receipt of section 481 film tax relief particularly following a recent ruling by the scope section that one of the regular recipients of section 481 over many years was found to have wrongly classified an employee as self-employed and in circumstances in which many workers in the industry claim this practice is widespread; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17197/21]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.