PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 977

977. Deputy Gerry Adams asked the Minister for Health the additional funding that was allocated to respite services for persons with disabilities in County Louth in budget 2017, as per commitments made by the Minister of State with special responsibility for disabilities (details supplied); the location and type of additional respite beds; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14016/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

21 March 2017

Last action

21 March 2017 · Respite Care Services Provision

Status

written

Sponsors

Gerry Adams

Subjects

Budget

Source updated

21 March 2017

Budget

Summary

977. Deputy Gerry Adams asked the Minister for Health the additional funding that was allocated to respite services for persons with disabilities in County Louth in budget 2017, as per commitments made by the Minister of State with special responsibility for disabilities (details supplied); the location and type of additional respite beds; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14016/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 21 March 2017

    Respite Care Services Provision

    977. Deputy Gerry Adams asked the Minister for Health the additional funding that was allocated to respite services for persons with disabilities in County Louth in budget 2017, as per commitments made by the Minister of State with special responsibility for disabilities (details supplied); the location and type of additional respite beds; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14016/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Respite Care Services Provision

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Gerry Adams · Asking member
  • Health · Health · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.