PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 98

147 Mr. Haughey asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if her Department can give advice to employees of a company (details supplied) in Dublin 13 who have not been paid for five weeks, even though the company is not in receivership, in liquidation or officially insolvent; if she appreciates that these employees cannot claim social welfare in view of the fact that they have not been issued with P45s; if they would lose their rights under the Protection of Employees (Employer's Insolvency) Acts if they were successful in claiming social welfare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [18272/02]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

15 October 2002

Last action

Status

oral

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

15 October 2002

Summary

147 Mr. Haughey asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if her Department can give advice to employees of a company (details supplied) in Dublin 13 who have not been paid for five weeks, even though the company is not in receivership, in liquidation or officially insolvent; if she appreciates that these employees cannot claim social welfare in view of the fact that they have not been issued with P45s; if they would lose their rights under the Protection of Employees (Employer's Insolvency) Acts if they were successful in claiming social welfare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [18272/02]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Adjournment Debate. - Protection of Employees.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.