Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 985

985. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance his views on the absence of a policy by the prize bond company requiring the routine issuing of annual statements of account to prize bond holders; if he is aware that executors and personal representatives may mistakenly omit wealth from an estate due to a lack of knowledge arising from this absence of regular annual statements; if he is concerned that a lack of regular correspondence with prize bond holders may give rise to prize bond companies not keeping accurate records; his views on the need to require regular statements to prize bond holders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26941/26]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

14 April 2026

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 April 2026

Summary

985. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance his views on the absence of a policy by the prize bond company requiring the routine issuing of annual statements of account to prize bond holders; if he is aware that executors and personal representatives may mistakenly omit wealth from an estate due to a lack of knowledge arising from this absence of regular annual statements; if he is concerned that a lack of regular correspondence with prize bond holders may give rise to prize bond companies not keeping accurate records; his views on the need to require regular statements to prize bond holders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26941/26]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.