Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Amendment · Amendement

2011Z10736

Amendment of member Slob on declaring Article 2.3, fourth paragraph, Wro applicable mutatis mutandis, to a structural vision that can be drawn up on the basis of Article 5, fourth paragraph of the Route Act and on shortening the periods in Article 2.3, fourth paragraph, Wro

rejectedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

23 May 2011

Last action

Status

Afgedaan · Stemmen - verworpen · Niet beschikbaar bij moties en/of amendementen vóór 1 april 2019

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Amendment of member Slob on declaring Article 2.3, fourth paragraph, Wro applicable mutatis mutandis, to a structural vision that can be drawn up on the basis of Article 5, fourth paragraph of the Route Act and on shortening the periods in Article 2.3, fourth paragraph, Wro

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Amendement van het lid Slob over het van overeenkomstige toepassing verklaren van artikel 2.3, vierde lid, Wro, op een structuurvisie die kan worden opgesteld op grond van artikel 5, vierde lid van de Tracéwet én over het verkorten van de termijnen in artikel 2.3, vierde lid, Wro

View fileDownload file

  • Amendment by member Slob on the van overeenkomstige toepassing verklaren van artikel 2.3, vierde lid, Wro, op een structuurvisie die kan worden opgesteld op grond van artikel 5, vierde lid van de Tracéwet én on the verkorten van de termijnen in artikel 2.3, vierde lid, Wro

    Amendement · NL · 22 May 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.