PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Amendment · Amendement

2011Z20840

Amendment by member Spekman on the introduction of a 72-hour test to have the legality of detention assessed by a judge

rejectedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

25 October 2011

Last action

1 November 2011 · Rejected

Status

Afgedaan · Stemmen - verworpen · Niet beschikbaar bij moties en/of amendementen vóór 1 april 2019

Sponsors

Hans Spekman

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Amendment by member Spekman on the introduction of a 72-hour test to have the legality of detention assessed by a judge

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 24 October 2011

    Introduced

    Amendment by member Spekman on the introduction of a 72-hour test to have the legality of detention assessed by a judge

    Source: Amendment

  2. 24 October 2011

    Amendment

    Amendment by member Spekman on the introduction of a 72-hour test to have the legality of detention assessed by a judge

    Source: Amendment

  3. 1 November 2011

    Rejected

    Rejected

    Source: Stemmen - rejected

Votes

1 November 2011 · rejected · Stemmen - verworpen

Yes 72 · No 78 · Abstain 0 · Absent/not voting 0

  • CDATegen
  • ChristenUnieVoor
  • D66Voor
  • GroenLinksVoor
  • PVVTegen
  • PvdAVoor
  • PvdDVoor
  • SGPTegen

Showing the first 8 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

  • v2 · 28 October 2011
  • 2011D51348 · 24 October 2011

Documents

1 official file

Amendement van het lid Spekman over de invoering van een 72 uurtoets om de rechtmatigheid van inbewaringstelling te laten toetsen door een rechter

View fileDownload file

  • Amendement van het lid Spekman over de invoering van een 72 uurtoets om de rechtmatigheid van inbewaringstelling te laten toetsen door een rechter

    Amendement · NL · 24 October 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.