PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Amendment · Amendement

2013Z19504

Amendment by members Bisschop and Voortman that clarifies that the council can only refuse the PGB budget for that part that is more expensive than the offer proposed by the council

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

10 October 2013

Last action

9 October 2013 · Introduced

Status

Afgedaan · Niet beschikbaar bij moties en/of amendementen vóór 1 april 2019

Sponsors

Roelof Bisschop, Linda Voortman

Subjects

Budget

Source updated

19 February 2024

Budget

Summary

Amendment by members Bisschop and Voortman that clarifies that the council can only refuse the PGB budget for that part that is more expensive than the offer proposed by the council

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 9 October 2013

    Amendment

    Amendment by members Bisschop and Voortman that clarifies that the council can only refuse the PGB budget for that part that is more expensive than the offer proposed by the council

    Source: Amendment

  2. 9 October 2013

    Introduced

    Amendment by members Bisschop and Voortman that clarifies that the council can only refuse the PGB budget for that part that is more expensive than the offer proposed by the council

    Source: Amendment

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 15 October 2013
  • 2013D40328 · 9 October 2013
  • 2013D40328 · 9 October 2013

Documents

1 official file

Amendement van de leden Bisschop en Voortman dat verheldert dat het college het PGB budget slechts kan weigeren voor dat gedeelte dat duurder is dan het door het college voorgestelde aanbod

View fileDownload file

  • Amendement van de leden Bisschop en Voortman dat verheldert dat het college het PGB budget slechts kan weigeren voor dat gedeelte dat duurder is dan het door het college voorgestelde aanbod

    Amendement · NL · 9 October 2013

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.