PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Amendment · Amendement

2014Z15560

Sub-amendment by members Bergkamp and Pia Dijkstra, which stipulates that Wlz implementers must also take into account the sexual orientation of the insured in addition to the religious persuasion, belief or cultural background of the insured when contracting healthcare providers.

adoptedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

11 September 2014

Last action

Status

Afgedaan · Stemmen - aangenomen · Niet beschikbaar bij moties en/of amendementen vóór 1 april 2019

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Sub-amendment by members Bergkamp and Pia Dijkstra, which stipulates that Wlz implementers must also take into account the sexual orientation of the insured in addition to the religious persuasion, belief or cultural background of the insured when contracting healthcare providers.

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Subamendement van de leden Bergkamp en Pia Dijkstra dat regelt dat Wlz-uitvoerders bij het contracteren van zorgaanbieders naast de godsdienstige gezindheid, de levensovertuiging of de culturele achtergrond van de verzekerde ook rekening dienen te houden met de seksuele gerichtheid

View fileDownload file

  • Subamendement van de leden Bergkamp en Pia Dijkstra dat regelt dat Wlz-uitvoerders bij het contracteren van zorgaanbieders naast de godsdienstige gezindheid, de levensovertuiging of de culturele achtergrond van de verzekerde ook rekening dienen te houden met de seksuele gerichtheid

    Amendement · NL · 10 September 2014

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.