PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Motion · Motie

2009Z13294

Gew motion Van Gerven about stopping the self-regulation of the advertising code for drug manufacturers (t.v.v. 29 477, no. 95)

rejectedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

2 July 2009

Last action

2 July 2009 · Rejected

Status

Afgedaan · Stemmen - verworpen · Niet beschikbaar bij gewijzigde moties en/of amendementen

Sponsors

Henk van Gerven

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Gew motion Van Gerven about stopping the self-regulation of the advertising code for drug manufacturers (t.v.v. 29 477, no. 95)

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 1 July 2009

    Amended motion

    Gew motion Van Gerven about stopping the self-regulation of the advertising code for drug manufacturers (t.v.v. 29 477, no. 95)

    Source: Amended motion

  2. 1 July 2009

    Introduced

    Gew motion Van Gerven about stopping the self-regulation of the advertising code for drug manufacturers (t.v.v. 29 477, no. 95)

    Source: Motion

  3. 2 July 2009

    Rejected

    Rejected

    Source: Stemmen - rejected

Votes

2 July 2009 · rejected · Stemmen - verworpen

Yes 34 · No 116 · Abstain 0 · Absent/not voting 0

  • CDATegen
  • ChristenUnieTegen
  • D66Tegen
  • GroenLinksVoor
  • PVVTegen
  • PvdATegen
  • PvdDVoor
  • SGPTegen

Showing the first 8 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

  • v3 · 15 July 2009
  • 2009D34558 · 1 July 2009
  • 2009D34558 · 1 July 2009

Documents

1 official file

Gew motie Van Gerven over stoppen met de zelfregulering van de reclamecode voor geneesmiddelenfabrikanten (t.v.v. 29 477, nr. 95)

View fileDownload file

  • Gew motie Van Gerven over stoppen met de zelfregulering van de reclamecode voor geneesmiddelenfabrikanten (t.v.v. 29 477, nr. 95)

    Motie (gewijzigd/nader) · NL · 1 July 2009

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.