PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Motion · Motie

2013Z10602

Amended motion by member Beertema (t.v. 33495, no. 24) about not allowing the one-tier board in government-funded education

rejectedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

29 May 2013

Last action

4 June 2013 · Rejected

Status

Afgedaan · Stemmen - verworpen · Niet beschikbaar bij gewijzigde moties en/of amendementen

Sponsors

Harm Beertema

Subjects

Education

Source updated

19 February 2024

Education

Summary

Amended motion by member Beertema (t.v. 33495, no. 24) about not allowing the one-tier board in government-funded education

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 28 May 2013

    Amended motion

    Amended motion by member Beertema (t.v. 33495, no. 24) about not allowing the one-tier board in government-funded education

    Source: Amended motion

  2. 28 May 2013

    Introduced

    Amended motion by member Beertema (t.v. 33495, no. 24) about not allowing the one-tier board in government-funded education

    Source: Motion

  3. 4 June 2013

    Rejected

    Rejected.

    Source: Stemmen - rejected

Votes

4 June 2013 · rejected · Stemmen - verworpen

Yes 29 · No 121 · Abstain 0 · Absent/not voting 0

  • 50PLUSVoor
  • CDATegen
  • ChristenUnieTegen
  • D66Voor
  • GroenLinksTegen
  • PVVVoor
  • PvdATegen
  • PvdDTegen

Showing the first 8 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

  • v3 · 11 June 2013
  • 2013D21900 · 28 May 2013
  • 2013D21900 · 28 May 2013

Documents

1 official file

Gewijzigde motie van het lid Beertema (t.v.v. 33495, nr. 24) over niet toestaan van de one-tier board in het bekostigde onderwijs

View fileDownload file

  • Gewijzigde motie van het lid Beertema (t.v.v. 33495, nr. 24) over niet toestaan van de one-tier board in het bekostigde onderwijs

    Motie (gewijzigd/nader) · NL · 28 May 2013

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.