PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Motion · Motie

2014Z16068

Motion by member Samsom et al. on maximum support for initiatives that maintain employment in the region

adoptedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

18 September 2014

Last action

18 September 2014 · Adopted

Status

Afgedaan · Stemmen - aangenomen · Niet beschikbaar bij moties en/of amendementen vóór 1 april 2019

Sponsors

Diederik Samsom, Arie Slob, Kees van der Staaij

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Summary

Motion by member Samsom et al. on maximum support for initiatives that maintain employment in the region

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 17 September 2014

    Motion

    Motion by member Samsom et al. on maximum support for initiatives that maintain employment in the region

    Source: Motion

  2. 18 September 2014

    Introduced

    Introduced.

    Source: Introduced

  3. 18 September 2014

    Adopted

    Adopted.

    Source: Stemmen - adopted

Votes

18 September 2014 · adopted · Stemmen - aangenomen

Yes 136 · No 14 · Abstain 0 · Absent/not voting 0

  • 50PLUS/Baay-TimmermanVoor
  • 50PLUS/KleinVoor
  • CDAVoor
  • ChristenUnieVoor
  • D66Voor
  • GroenLinksVoor
  • Groep Bontes/Van KlaverenTegen
  • PVVTegen

Showing the first 8 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

  • v3 · 19 September 2014
  • 2014D32671 · 17 September 2014
  • 2014D32671 · 17 September 2014

Documents

1 official file

Motie van het lid Samsom c.s. over maximaal ondersteunen van initiatieven die de werkgelegenheid in de regio op peil houden

View fileDownload file

  • Motie van het lid Samsom c.s. over maximaal ondersteunen van initiatieven die de werkgelegenheid in de regio op peil houden

    Motie · NL · 17 September 2014

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.