PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Motion · Motie

2016Z20390

Motion by members Jasper van Dijk and Siderius about a pilot to pay the government contribution directly to the school location

rejectedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

3 November 2016

Last action

8 November 2016 · Rejected

Status

Afgedaan · Stemmen - verworpen · Niet beschikbaar bij moties en/of amendementen vóór 1 april 2019

Sponsors

Tjitske Siderius, Jasper van Dijk

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Motion by members Jasper van Dijk and Siderius about a pilot to pay the government contribution directly to the school location

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 2 November 2016

    Motion

    Motion by members Jasper van Dijk and Siderius about a pilot to pay the government contribution directly to the school location

    Source: Motion

  2. 3 November 2016

    Introduced

    Introduced.

    Source: Introduced

  3. 8 November 2016

    Rejected

    Rejected.

    Source: Stemmen - rejected

Votes

8 November 2016 · rejected · Stemmen - verworpen

Yes 23 · No 126 · Abstain 0 · Absent/not voting 1

  • 50PLUSTegen
  • CDATegen
  • ChristenUnieTegen
  • D66Tegen
  • GroenLinksVoor
  • Groep Bontes/Van KlaverenVoor
  • Groep Kuzu/ÖztürkTegen
  • HouwersTegen

Showing the first 8 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

  • v3 · 7 November 2016
  • 2016D42076 · 2 November 2016
  • 2016D42076 · 2 November 2016

Documents

1 official file

Motie van de leden Jasper van Dijk en Siderius over een pilot om de rijksbijdrage rechtstreeks aan de schoolvestiging uit te keren

View fileDownload file

  • Motie van de leden Jasper van Dijk en Siderius over een pilot om de rijksbijdrage rechtstreeks aan de schoolvestiging uit te keren

    Motie · NL · 2 November 2016

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.