Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Motion · Motie

2026Z08089

Motie van de leden Ellian en Ceulemans over erop toezien dat de pendelbus in Ter Apel niet gunstiger is dan regulier busvervoer

adoptedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

16 April 2026

Last action

21 April 2026 · Adopted

Status

Afgedaan · Stemmen - aangenomen · Oordeel Kamer

Sponsors

Ulysse Ellian, Simon Ceulemans

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

20 July 2026

Summary

Motie van de leden Ellian en Ceulemans over erop toezien dat de pendelbus in Ter Apel niet gunstiger is dan regulier busvervoer

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 15 April 2026

    Motie

    Motie van de leden Ellian en Ceulemans over erop toezien dat de pendelbus in Ter Apel niet gunstiger is dan regulier busvervoer

    Source: Motie

  2. 16 April 2026

    Introduced

    Ingediend

    Source: Ingediend

  3. 21 April 2026

    Adopted

    Aangenomen.

    Source: Stemmen - aangenomen

Votes

21 April 2026 · adopted · Stemmen - aangenomen

Yes 123 · No 27 · Abstain 0 · Absent/not voting 0

  • 50PLUSVoor
  • BBBVoor
  • CDAVoor
  • ChristenUnieVoor

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

  • kst-19637-3534 · 17 April 2026

Documents

1 official file

Motie van de leden Ellian en Ceulemans over erop toezien dat de pendelbus in Ter Apel niet gunstiger is dan regulier busvervoer

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Motie van de leden Ellian en Ceulemans over erop toezien dat de pendelbus in Ter Apel niet gunstiger is dan regulier busvervoer

    Motie · NL · 15 April 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.