Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2009Z12800

Geplande gasboringen op Ameland

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

30 June 2009

Last action

30 July 2009 · Aanhangsel van de Handelingen

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Diederik Samsom, Lutz Jacobi

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Geplande gasboringen op Ameland

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 29 June 2009

    Written questions

    Geplande gasboringen op Ameland

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 30 July 2009

    Aanhangsel van de Handelingen

    Antwoord vragen Jacobi en Samson over de geplande gasboringen op Ameland

    Source: Aanhangsel van de Handelingen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 10 August 2009
  • 2009D37556 · 30 July 2009
  • 2009D37556 · 30 July 2009
  • v1 · 30 June 2009

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord vragen Jacobi en Samson over de geplande gasboringen op Ameland

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord vragen Jacobi en Samson over de geplande gasboringen op Ameland

    Aanhangsel van de Handelingen · NL · 30 July 2009

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Geplande gasboringen op Ameland

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 29 June 2009

    DownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.