Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2010Z09039

Het besluit station Lisse niet te realiseren

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

2 June 2010

Last action

23 June 2010 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Ernst Cramer

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Het besluit station Lisse niet te realiseren

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 1 June 2010

    Written questions

    Het besluit station Lisse niet te realiseren

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 23 June 2010

    Answer

    Antwoord vragen Cramer over het besluit station Lisse niet te realiseren

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v2 · 6 July 2010
  • 2010D27833 · 23 June 2010
  • v2 · 3 June 2010
  • 2010D24594 · 1 June 2010

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord vragen Cramer over het besluit station Lisse niet te realiseren

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord vragen Cramer over het besluit station Lisse niet te realiseren

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 23 June 2010

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Het besluit station Lisse niet te realiseren

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 1 June 2010

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.