Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2011Z08062

De veroordeling van een blogger in Egypte

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

15 April 2011

Last action

30 May 2011 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Mariko Peters

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

De veroordeling van een blogger in Egypte

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 14 April 2011

    Written questions

    De veroordeling van een blogger in Egypte

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 30 May 2011

    Answer

    Antwoord vragen Peters over de veroordeling van een blogger

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 6 June 2011
  • 2011D28202 · 30 May 2011
  • 2011D28202 · 30 May 2011
  • v3 · 20 April 2011
  • 2011D20072 · 14 April 2011
  • 2011D20072 · 14 April 2011

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord vragen Peters over de veroordeling van een blogger

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord vragen Peters over de veroordeling van een blogger

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 30 May 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • De veroordeling van een blogger in Egypte

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 14 April 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.